Saturday, September 08, 2007

Moving on...

TO WORDPRESS.COM !!!


THE WAY I SEE IT on Blogger.com will still be here forever but for archival purposes. Thank you Blogger.com for the past 2 and a half years. For those who have linked up with me, my new address on WordPress.com will behttp://ftloveblog70.wordpress.com/ . May you enjoy the new blogsite!

Labels:

Friday, September 07, 2007

Congratulations Halle BUT...



I must come into full agreement with Booker Rising's Shay on this issue. Yes, I am glad that actress Halle Berry is deciding to bring a child into the world but as Shay rightfully protests that this is "another out-of-wedlock situation". "Not another family values" commentary, you may say. Well, I am afraid yes---this is going to be a family values discussion. "How dare you impose your values on Halle Berry?" One may protest. How about for me to turn this around and say this to you, "How dare actresses like Halle, IMPOSE their values on North American society?!" It seems that many Hollywood actors and actresses seem to pay it no mind of having children out of marriage, thinking it is their divine right to "redefine" the family. Anyone who wants to propose to continue how things were done the "old-fashioned" way which was to fall in love, get married and have children is seen as stupid, naive beyond human comprehension, worthy of contemptful satirical humour and is monitored with Neo-McCarthyist suspicion. For goodness sake, it doesn't take an Einstein that marriage and the family were the stabilizing influence for society for thousands of years. Though Christianity throughout the ages had it's neurotic issues and controversies, it is to be complemented that Christianity as a whole, sought to preserve those values for over 2000 years. Yes, those values have passed the test of time and in general(with few exceptions) have worked. It has been since the 1960's that the social engineers aggressively sought to redefine those values and marginalize those who dared to dissent. This nearly 40 years old experimentation hasn't worked very well hasn't it. What does this have to with Halle Berry? Well, I guess this is a discussion about her choice to have a child outside marriage and with her being a famous person, she needs to recognize that this has consequences of literally shaping and molding attitudes of general public. She may innocently not think that this is not the case but the fact remains that the opposite rings true. This further solidifies the mentality of many that marriage is not that important anymore. It further solidifies the mentality of the false belief that you really don't need a mother and father both living together to raise a child. As Shay has rightfully pointed out, that this has ramifications for the black community both in the United States and in Canada (as Halle Berry is a woman who has African American ancestry) in solidifying the mentality that single motherhood is glamourous (talk my mom who has raised me and my brother and I am sure she will tell you it's anything but), natural and it is thing to do. Common sense should tell anybody, isn't sooo much easier having a father and mother raising a child together? It is my wish that that there be a generation of Hollywood actors (born after 2000) that is not afraid to fall in love, get married and have children---the old fashioned way! In their decision, it will be a bold, courageous, brash and rebellious decision against their older counterparts. There is nothing wrong with the traditional family in and by itself. It is people who do not understand (or care not to understand) the roles in a traditional family that run amock and abuse it. I understand Halle Berry's reluctance to getting married because of her two previous failed relationships but it is my firm hope that in the not-to-distant future, Halle will receive spiritual guidance that will transform her as a person and have an understanding that marriage is child-centred, not self-centred as many people have mistakenly assumed. As for now, my sincere best wishes for Halle Berry, my fellow Canadian (and her boyfriend) Gabriel Aubry and the upcoming child.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

IN MEMORIAM




LUCIANO PAVAROTTI

1935-2007


I regret to inform all that Opera singer Luciano Pavarotti's illness with pancreatic cancer has ended in the manner least expected by all of us. CNN International confirmed his passing at his home in Italy at 5 a.m. local time. We thank you Luciano for the wonderful voice and music you provided for over the years. It will be truly missed. Rest in peace, sir.

Labels: ,

Shay on NPR

"What is NPR" My fellow Canadian viewers may ask? That is the radio version of PBS in the United States. Fellow bloggist Shay of Booker Rising will be on a radio show called News and Notes hosted by fellow GenX journalist Farai Chideya . An audio of today's show will be heard at 4:00 p.m. The website to log on to is http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=11 . I hope all will enjoy it.

Labels: , ,

John, you held yourself well



Congratulations John for handling yourself and your case for faith based schools on yesterday's edition of TVO's The Agenda. Now you and your supporters need to continue to articulate that message and make sure the voters are hearing the truth (which McGuinty and friends have done a good job distorting).

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 31, 2007

SPECIAL MEMORIAM TO PRINCESS DIANA: 1961-1997

Who truly was the Queen of Hearts and The People's Princess. My tribute on the 10th anniversary of death of Princess Diana is none other than Brian Adams' Diana with his special tribute video to her.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Two thumbs up for Resurrecting the Champ!



If you were disappointed with the summer of threquels (Oh yes, this includes Rush Hour 3---where Chris Tucker was no longer funny but rude and obnoxious, Spider Man Three and Pirates of the Carribean At World's End where it was decided that the audience needed to be confused as hell for the perverse joy of it---the only threequel I found that didn't disappoint was the Bourne Ultimatim) here is a movie that was released this past Friday. It didn't have the flashy hype of promotion. Thank God it didn't because it didn't need to. It was for the serious thinking movie goer. It was a movie that will not insult your intelligence by special effects and random action scenes for the sake of it. Also,it wasn't a threequel. Resurrecting the Champ that stars Josh Harnett and Samuel L. Jackson about a relationship between a journalist and a homeless man who called himself "The Champ" who makes a very serious claim that he was fomer boxer Bob Satterfield. This claim does have a very big focus in the movie with a surprise twist to follow (I'm not spoiling the movie). I applaud Josh Harnett's performance, he is one of those few damn good actors (who usually is the sensitive hunk in his movies ie. Hollywood Homicide)who knows how to pick a good movie to star in (hint, hint,Sandra) and Samuel L. Jackson...what can I say, you give him ANY role, he does it with intensity. The movie is also based on father and son relationships, integrity, honesty,standing up for principle, taking responsibility, discovering the truth---no matter where the road takes you. It has funny moments and most definately and unavoidably some very sad moments. I am not going to give you a thorough plot summary but I recommend that you go out and see this movie to be entertained and to learn some of life's lessons at the same time. Should this get some Oscar considerations? Maybe, but probably it won't. I hope I'm wrong. If you are looking for a break from the flash in the pan shallow entertainment, Resurrecting the Champ is definately for you and I give this movie two thumbs waaay up!

Labels: ,

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Intelligent quote of the day

You are talking as if "blackness" is some type of universal concept among all people who are decendants of today's black African population?Wow...if so why is it that black folks in Africa are murdering each other on a regular basis over larger differences in religion, culture, language, life style, etc?Please tell me what it is a Sudanese Niolitic tribeman, a Turag nomad, a Khoisan Bushman, a Pgymy, a Haitian, a black American, and a Somali have in common...hell their skin color and other features vary so much you can tell most of them apart pretty quickly.Hell same can be said for most of European history and most of the history of East and SEAsia.This mythological pan-black nonsense is just that, it has never existed but for some faux-intellectual elites and their hangers-on no more than Hitler's Pan-Aryanism existed. Hell Hitler teamed up with Japanese to kill white people, so much for his Pan-white-Aryan nonsense.Cobb could have said it a little better, but he is on to something big, I think he needs to go back and clean it up a little to make it presentable but I feel where he is going with it.What cobb said is dead on " I firmly believe that there is no essence in blackness, that blackness is a cultural, political and intellectual construct born out of a historically specific period."I would go further and say that it is not just American, but a Francaphone and Anglophone intellectual elitist concept that gave rise to differeing interpretations in differing areas of the world but has no real unity other than "race" which has never really united any group of people for long periods of time anyway and it didn't unite these folks from very different cultural perspectives beyond a short time either and never really spread to the "masses" other than those who pay it lip service.From our perspective "blackness" is a racialist political concept that grew out of various black power and pan-Africanist movements from the early 1900's and reached and epicenter in America in early 1970's. IT still gets lip service today to rally the poor masses and the leftist intellectual elite, but that is about it.It is just faux tribute to anything remotely seen as "of the black race" even if the people who promote it don't really even understand exactly what it is they are promoting, which I find a lot, they have nothing but a superificial understanding of the things they are promoting, especially the historical things, and it is basically nonsense when you break it down.IT is similar to White nationalist promoting everything they "think is white" or done by a "white person" which is often ridiculous if you look at some of their argument.I see black nationalist/pan africanist as mirror images (reactionary versions) of white nationalists. They only differnece is they do not tend to be violent or open to racial purging of other races, but much of what they do and their propoganda is exactly the same...This ideology naturally bleeds over into political realities in the black community becaues the elites are really calling the shots, supposedly speaking for the everyday black man (when they are really speaking for the ghetto).


Dragon Horse responding to the Quote of Day column on Shay's Booker Rising rightful critiquing racial collectivism among both black nationalists and white supremacists

Labels:

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Interesting blog







Last night from a good hard night from work, I was doing some websurfing and discovered this interesting blog called 101 People Who Are Screwing Up Canada by a New Brunswick-based social conservative why goes by the pseudonym by Spinks. His top two people are none other than abortionist (and abortion rights activist) Henry Morgentaler and scientist and environmentalist David Suzuki (I guess his self-righteousness rubs some people the wrong way). People who I wish were off the list are Brian Mulroney, his son Ben ---and for goodness sake Peter MacKay. People like Belinda Stronach, the national press, Conrad Black and the like belong there and should never be taken off! Go to http://101people.blogspot.com/ to check out who is one the list and to see whether you agree or not they belong there!

Labels:

Links